This opinion piece by Zef Chavets - titled “Anti-Semitic comments aren’t kosher, Mr. Gibson” - first appeared in the Los Angeles Times.  But yesterday it was syndicated by our good friends at the San Jose Mercury News.  It contained the word, “goyish”, which places it well within range of the RD artillery …

TO: George Riggs, Publisher, San Jose Mercury News (MediaNews Group)

TO: Stephen E. Wright, Editorial Page Editor, San Jose Mercury News (MediaNews Group)

ON: August 4, 2006

RE: Editorial Page Essay (Page 14A) by Zev Chafets (Written for Los Angeles Times)

We strongly protest your endorsement of a derivative of “goy” in the Chafets essay today. The words “goy,” “goyish,” and “goyim” represent such a packet of hatred that we feel it necessary to object loudly and clearly to Chafets’ effort to name us with this ugly and divisive label.

Chafets used the ugly “goyish” term in this sentence:

“But after the film [“The Passion”] grossed more than $600 million, these execs raised Gibson on their shoulders and began optioning every goyish property from Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians to the Anglican Book of Common Prayer.” More than a little anti-Christian bigotry lurks in that sentence, but our concern is with “goyish.”

[And what an odd slur to publish on the Friday after the Wednesday when the San Jose Mercury News officially passed to the MediaNews of Denver. Are we going to have a new flood of bigotry and divisiveness under MediaNews?]

Chafets’ claim to name the rest of us in the world is obviously based on a claim to supremacy—after all, what is the claim to have the right to name the other than a claim based on supremacy? Members of all races and religions appear to have sought to impose their name for the other on the other, but it is astounding to see the San Jose Mercury News, on its second day under new ownership, privilege Chafets’ dream of lording it over others by naming them as he chooses.

It shouldn’t be news to the publisher and editorial page editor of the San Jose Mercury News that this kind of labeling is the ultimate in divisive talk—Chafets just divides the world into two chunks of humanity, and names the one he is not a member of!

And it shouldn’t be news to the publisher and editorial page editor of the San Jose Mercury News that it is the members of any group under discussion that have the unlimited right and privilege to name themselves. What part of “Our Names, Ourselves” don’t you understand?

The most remarkable thing about the evil triplets (goy, goyish, goyim) is that the use of these terms serves to suppress the diversity of every other group in the world except for the group with which Chafets identifies. This is a kind of ultimate arrogance that surprised us to see the San Jose Mercury News endorse by publishing Chafets’ piece.

While “goyish” is divisive, supremacy-driven, and anti-diversity, we do not claim it is offensive. We are not concerned about our feelings in this matter, only that the mean-spiritedness of Chafets (and his publishers) should be laid bare.

The Ninth Circuit spoke out on the “goy” word in Baballah v. Ashcroft, decided 7/11/03.

Here is part of what the court said in its decision about Baballah’s treatment in Israel, before granting him asylum in the USA.

Referring to treatment by employers, “Although Baballah had studied to be an accountant, bank official refused to hire him when they discovered his background. These officials told him that he would ‘follow in [his] father’s footsteps’ and called him a ‘goy’...and [he was] turned away.”

The San Francisco Chronicle published an excellent article (7/12/03) on this decision which also discusses “goy.”

Kindly cease and desist the pattern and practice of endorsing divisive, supremacy-driven, and anti-diversity labels for us on your editorial page and throughout your paper. Kindly update your “style book” to enforce the cultural and social rule that only members of groups get to name their own groups. Remember, “Our Names, Ourselves.”

Bo Sears
ResistingDefamation.org

It is my contention that a good dose of applied Salterism would do much to bind together white nationalist politics and concentrate them in the right place - which, in turn, would vivify them no end.  Ethnic genetic interest resides, for example, in the attachment of a people to its lineage and to its land, and to its own nature as expressed in its traditions.  These are the classic lodestars of nationalism.  But EGI is at its most imperative by far in the matter of perpetuation, and in that of homogeneity.  In an age as dangerously bereft of racial consciousness as the present, EGI makes the case for European preservationism on irrefutable scientific grounds.

This is the second of my three-part post on the vexing issue of white nationalism, the first being merely a Prelude.

Since the expulsion of the Moors, politics in Western Europe have never specifically been a repository of racial preservationism.  Even in the Germany of the 1930’s the politics were not purposively preservationist.  They were self-reverential, self-laudatory.  They were supremacist.  But they were not preservationist other than in an implied sense.

Preservationism is really nothing more than those active measures a people takes to defend itself against extinction or displacement.  Moorish invasions aside, in the long period since European populations became settled there has been little use for it.  The history of intra-European warfare demonstrates that kingly power and prestige, and greed, faith, history and freedom moved men to kill one another.  In such causes European nations sought conquest over one another and sometimes contested land.  But scarcely, if ever, was the goal to extinguish a European enemy’s population.

So for us racial preservationism is not as close to the surface as we think.  Yet the already impinging crisis in the West has to be answered much more out of this instinct than out of any political precedent.  What one might call traditional nationalist politics are near to silent on the issue.  Politically, we have to make this up as we go along.

READ MORE...

Breaking Fake News: The BBC(BBC Los Angeles, whoever that is) reports (with a greyed-out footer that says “This article may be faux. Please Remember to check the facts.”)  that according to sources from the Los Angeles FBI, Mel Gibson has been under investigation for months regarding allegations that he has been funneling money to groups in the middle east such Hezbollah and Hamas. He has now been arrested for terrorism according to the fake news story.  I’m not sure whether their site breaks any laws regarding trademarks but it certainly is a believable story given the police state mentality of the neocons.

There can, it seems, be too much of a good thing.  JR’s inimitable contributions on the vexed issue of physical perfection may, by their popularity, have been responsible for the CPU problems we’ve had over the past few months.

In any event, our hosting service pulled the plug on us on Friday because we were starving other sites filed on the server.  Can’t complain about that.  Bluehost have a duty to their other paying customers.

JR has now cut back our CPU consumption and we are restored to life.  It’s time to apologise to all MR readers who have been confronted by a “Site Suspended” notice over the last couple of days.  We think the situation will be sufficiently stable to allow uninterrupted operation in the short-term.  Long-term, another solution will have to be found - on which more later.

Thanks again for your patience and thanks for coming back.

GW

“We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.”

“When,” he says.  When!  There before our amazed eyes stands the liberal in all his indifference and naivety, modelled for us with jaw-dropping honesty by the Swedish Integration Minister Jens Orback in a recent interview on Swedish radio.

I think this is just about the clearest statement of liberal-elite intent that I have ever encountered.  The things that folk like us say will come to pass he says too.  But he is totally untroubled by it, suffering from not the slightest remorse or sense of shame.  He simply has no concept of its meaning for his own, sorry people.  One must conclude that he is missing a fair quantity of essential, normalising brain circuitry.  And, indeed, he does seem very like some political parallel of the psychopath whose emotional life is all shallow affectation and whose capacity for love, empathy, guilt, remorse and even fear is in absentia.

Now, tempting though that conclusion is, it might not be the right one.

I say that because some months ago an MR regular pressed upon me the depressing view that, far from being a psychopathy of the elite, Jens’ Total Altruism is an evolutionarily-fit behaviour selected because sympathy is more hard-wired among European peoples than self-preservation.  In essence, then, the liberal zeitgeist that I bang on about all the time is the issue – and not the progenitor - of this new and, for us, final course in the river of life.  It is an effulgence of no meaning in itself except as it is defined by that vital, blind force - a definition, let it be said, that does not include liberalism’s own impertinent denial of that force.

READ MORE...

In the aftermath of the (still ongoing) genocide of whites by the land barons, we have this report from the Los Angeles Times euphemistically titled: “Rich, Poor Live Poles Apart in L.A. as Middle Class Keeps Shrinking”:

Demographers at Wayne State University in Detroit recently found Greater Los Angeles to be the most economically segregated region in the country. The study found only about 28% of its neighborhoods to be middle-class or mixedincome, compared with more than half of those in Nashville, Pittsburgh, Seattle and Portland, Ore.

More than two-thirds of L.A.-area residents live in neighborhoods that are solidly rich or poor, according to the analysis, which is based on 2000 census data. That share has been steadily growing for three decades, said one of the study’s authors, George Galster, a professor of urban affairs at Wayne State…

The trend parallels a well-documented loss of middleincome jobs in the United States over a generation. But the study found that middle-class neighborhoods are disappearing at a much faster rate than the comparable jobs.

The remedies recommended by those the article quotes would be laughable if the situation weren’t so disasterous…

READ MORE...

The cost of reproduction has risen by a factor of nearly 4 since I was born in 1954, fertilizing the portfolios of landlords, or more properly, land barons, with the decomposing marriages, fetuses and sometimes bodies of the bulk of the baby boom generation, leaving a demographic hole being filled with imported slaves* by those same landlords.

The baronage calls this “progress”, even as as the price of homes was removed from the consumer price index while introducing CPI factors like “hedonic value” and “imputed rent” to make it appear “real” earnings have increased over the time period of demographic collapse and loss of ethnic enfranchisement to imported laborers for the baronage.

I call it genocide.

*It is really being too kind to the baronage to call the imported laborers “slaves” since the baronage doesn’t have to pay for their human capital upkeep—the rest of us do via social programs.  Southern Plantation owners were far more moral than these sorry excuses for human beings.

READ MORE...